Draft Policy 705.11

 

Annual Commissionerís Performance Review

 

This supplements the Boardís standing policy concerning Commissioner and Board performance reviews.† It details the purposes and process by which the Commissionerís performance shall be reviewed each year.

 

Purposes

 

The purpose of the evaluation process is to enable the Commissioner to strengthen his or her performance, to foster professional development, to enable the Commissioner and Board to set mutually agreeable goals, and to inform annual decisions on compensation adjustments and other terms of employment.

 

Responsibility

 

It shall be the boardís responsibility to assess the Commissionerís performance and to solicit the views of other leaders within and outside of the institution.† For the purposes of annual Commissioner reviews, however, the process shall be a private matter between the Board and the Commissioner and may be conducted in executive session at the request of the Commissioner.† The board delegates to the Board Chair the responsibility for organizing and conducting the performance review process with the Commissioner.

 

Process

 

The heart of this process shall be a written management-review statement by the Commissioner in a format and timetable mutually agreed upon with the board.† The Commissioner will have wide latitude in the format of this report but it should present a clear picture of the Montana University Systemís academic and financial progress and condition, and use appropriate qualitative and quantitative benchmarks.† It should highlight the Commissionerís major achievement and concerns and include explanations of underperformance in specific areas.† It should also document the University Systemís record of service to the State of Montana, the major improvements in and current condition of the physical plant, and overall morale.† The Commissioner should reflect on his or her leadership style and effectiveness, working relations with system members and other public and private leaders, and with the broader higher education communities.† References to preceding annual performance reviews are appropriate.

 

The Commissioner will also propose a manageable number of goals for the coming twelve months (usually between five and ten goals).† The Commissioner will also suggest measurable performance levels for each goal so the Board can decide in advance what constitutes poor, acceptable, or outstanding levels of performance.† The Board and Commissioner will then jointly agree upon the goals and levels of performance for each.† At the end of the reporting period, the Board and the Commissioner will then measure the Commissionerís performance against the objectives that have been jointly agreed upon.

 

Normally, unless revised by the Board in consultation with the Commissioner in the intervening period, the Commissionerís management-review statement will retain the same format.† This statement, along with any supplemental information the Board may have requested of the Commissioner, shall be sent to all Board members at least 30 days before the board meeting at which the Commissionerís review process and goals will be discussed (with the Commissioner present).† Because this statement constitutes a potentially sensitive personnel matter, all Board members will treat it as strictly confidential information. The board meeting at which the Commissionerís annual performance review is conducted will be completed prior to the termination of the contract period for the Commissioner.† After the performance review of the Commissioner, the Chair of the Board, with assistance from other members as necessary, will draft a written, confidential summary of the Boardís evaluation for consideration by the Board at the next meeting.

 

At the Boardís next regularly scheduled meeting, in an executive session (if requested by the Commissioner), the Board shall engage the Commissioner in a discussion of the Commissionerís goals for the subsequent year and the Board will then approve the result.† The Board will also modify (if necessary) and ratify the written performance review of the Commissioner prepared by the Board Chair.† This meeting is intended for the Board and the Commissioner to have a wide-ranging discussion about the conduct of the Commissioner within the context of the Montana University Systemís progress.† The Board, of course, reserves the right to adjust the proposed goals and priorities.† At this time the board will also review the Commissionerís job description and make adjustments as is deemed necessary.

 

Outcomes

 

Following discussions with the Commissioner about the Commissionerís performance, and following agreement on his or her goals for the next twelve months, the Board shall, in an executive session, receive, discuss, and ratify the recommendations for the next yearís goals.††